Skip to content

Invest1 publisher3 min readPublished Updated

Quartz's £2.75M pre-seed funds an AI adviser licensed only to read accounts

Daphni led the round alongside Outward VC and K Fund. Founder Andre Silva says the app is an independent financial advisor to the user, a status Quartz is not regulated to hold and says it hopes to obtain later.

The Investor · Invest desk

Photograph accompanying Quartz's £2.75M pre-seed funds an AI adviser licensed only to read accounts
Photo: techfundingnews.com

What happened

  • Quartz, founded in 2025 by former Revolut and N26 operators, raised 2.75 million pounds in pre-seed funding led by Daphni, with Outward VC and K Fund also in the round.
  • The company holds one FCA authorisation, as an account information service provider, which permits aggregating a customer's account data and does not permit regulated advice.
  • The app links pensions, ISAs, savings and investments, and adds Charlie, a conversational AI that founder Andre Silva refers to as a personal banker.
  • An invitation-only waitlist opened this week on the App Store and Google Play, with the technology built in Portugal and Spain and regulatory operations run out of London.

Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • constraint The execution stage Silva describes, trading on a user's behalf, waits on FCA approval, so the pre-seed has to cover both the build and a wait of unpublished length.
  • decision Quartz is spending its first round on consumers and putting the permission second; Clove spent $14 million on permissions first, and each order sets what the next raise has to pay for.
  • contradiction In the same interview Silva describes an independent financial adviser function and says the firm is not regulated as one, and that gap is the first thing a regulator or an unhappy customer reaches for.
  • precedent If consumer AI guidance can be sold under an aggregation permission, the cheap route for the next entrant is distribution first and authorisation afterwards.

Split across the ten-person team, the round is £275,000 a head [20][6]. The sequence Silva describes for spending it is fixed: guidance now, comprehensive advice once the FCA approves it, then executing trades on users' behalf [16].

Two companies in the same market bought the order the other way round. Nevis, founded by former Revolut staff, raised $35 million to sell AI tools to advisers [12]. Clove, drawn from the Paddle and Trouva teams, raised $14 million to obtain full advice permissions from regulated human advisers [13]. The two rounds add to $49 million [22], and both routes run through people who already hold the licence.

The same problem shapes the engineering. The model runs no calculations of its own; dedicated tools handle the financial ratio work and the AI collects the results, which Silva thinks reduces the risk of errors [9]. The system uses models from Anthropic and OpenAI, tracks each user's goals and risk profile, forwards unclear cases to human reviewers, and has already had a year of human review and training [10]. Paul Bazin, a partner at Daphni, said a new generation of savers has needs different from those of their parents. Quartz is "the first company we have come across that has both the product instincts and the regulatory foundations" needed to serve them, he said [14].

The vocabulary strains. Silva told Tech Funding News that Quartz is an independent financial advisor to the user [19], and the permission the company holds does not extend to advice [2]. "At the moment we are not regulated as financial advisors, though we would like to obtain that status in the future," Silva said [4]. Tech Funding News did not report a valuation for the round or a date for the application.

For a category figure, the round is priced against wealthtech at $22.99 billion in 2025 going to $71.59 billion in 2030 [15]. That is 3.1 times in five years, about 25.5 per cent a year compounded [21].

If the FCA grants advice permissions inside this round's runway, the pre-seed will have bought distribution ahead of the licence cheaply. If the perimeter question gets asked first, the product narrows back toward aggregation. That puts Quartz nearer Emma and Cleo, which focus on budgeting, than the offline advisers Silva names as his main competition [11]. A third path runs through a sale to someone already licensed, and the angel list is suggestive. Philippe Gelis, who co-founded Kantox and sold it to BNP Paribas for about 120 million euros in 2023, is in the round [17].

In my view the £2.75 million is priced as an option on authorisation, not as capital to scale a consumer wealth app [1]. Silva has already planned the step that would settle it: Charlie asks users questions and, with their permission, carries out the suggested actions through their linked accounts [18]. If that ships while Quartz still holds only the aggregation permission [2], the sequencing is a deliberate test of how much an unlicensed product can include.

What to watch

  • Whether Quartz applies for FCA advice permissions, and whether it does so before Charlie starts acting inside linked accounts.
  • Whether the invitation-only waitlist converts into paying users, and at what price, before the next round.
  • Whether Nevis's adviser tools or Clove's licensed-adviser model reaches consumers first with a full advice permission.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories