Invest1 distinct publisher3 min readUpdated
A Solana memecoin launchpad ranked third in seven-day protocol revenue behind Tether and Circle, according to DefiLlama data. The dollars are real; the durability is the open question.
The Investor · Invest desk
Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made
A platform that lets anyone launch a memecoin in under two minutes took in roughly $12 million of revenue over seven days, ranking third among all crypto protocols behind Tether at $111.88 million and Circle at $44.45 million, according to DefiLlama data cited by Crypto Briefing [1][2][3]. Crypto Briefing frames the result as Pump.fun out-earning virtually every DeFi protocol, DEX and lending platform in the industry over the same window, which is the part worth sitting with: the highest-margin activity onchain is not credit or market-making, it is issuing things to speculate on [4].
The mechanism is unglamorous. Pump.fun charges fees on bonding-curve trades for newly created tokens, collects a graduation fee when those tokens migrate to decentralised exchanges, and takes further income from PumpSwap, its own trading venue [5]. Fees over the trailing 24 hours were $1.62 million and 30-day revenue was $40.51 million [6][7]. The source calls the current pace roughly in line with recent performance rather than a spike [8], though the arithmetic shows a modest premium: $40.51 million over 30 days is about $1.35 million a day, while $12 million over seven days is about $1.71 million a day, roughly 27 percent higher [9].
Cumulative revenue since launch in early 2024 is over $1.2 billion, accumulated across multiple waves of memecoin enthusiasm rather than one mania [10][11]. At the current 30-day pace, that entire history is worth about 30 months of run-rate revenue, which tells you how compressed the earning period has been [12]. Half of all revenue goes into buying PUMP on the open market and burning it, implying roughly $600 million of cumulative buybacks and about $6 million in the reported week [13][14][15].
The comparison to the stablecoin issuers is where the quality difference shows. Tether and Circle earn primarily from yield on reserve assets, essentially Treasury rates applied to tens of billions in deposits, so their revenue is a function of macro conditions and float size [16]. Pump.fun's revenue is a pure function of onchain trading activity [17]. In dollar terms the launchpad is at 10.7 percent of Tether's week and 27 percent of Circle's [18][19]. In duration terms it is not comparable at all: float and rates move slowly, and speculative churn does not. Crypto Briefing notes that Hyperliquid, one of the breakout perpetuals venues of 2024-2025, has consistently ranked behind Pump.fun during periods of elevated memecoin trading, which is a conditional worth reading closely [20].
The buyback design carries the same cyclicality. Because the burn is fixed at half of fee income, its purchasing power falls in exact proportion to revenue, so support for the token weakens precisely when activity does [21].
What to watch: whether the seven-day pace holds above the 30-day average or the ratio inverts, which is the earliest read on whether this is a new plateau or the top of a wave [9]. Watch the mix between bonding-curve fees, graduation fees and PumpSwap, since a venue with its own DEX has a different revenue profile than a pure issuance toll [5]. And watch whether the pattern of revenue accruing across successive waves continues, or whether the cumulative figure stops moving [11].
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
Pump.fun, a platform that lets anyone launch a memecoin in under two minutes, pulled in roughly $12 million in 7-day revenue according to DefiLlama data, ranking third highest-earning protocol across all of crypto.
Tether ranked first with $111.88 million in 7-day revenue.
Circle ranked second with $44.45 million in 7-day revenue.
The memecoin launchpad is generating more weekly revenue than virtually every DeFi protocol, DEX, and lending platform in crypto.
Pump.fun is Solana-based and charges fees on bonding-curve trades for newly created tokens, collects graduation fees when those tokens migrate to decentralized exchanges, and earns additional income from PumpSwap, its companion trading product.
Since launching in early 2024, Pump.fun has cumulatively earned over $1.2 billion in total revenue.
Evidence-backed comparisons of source perspectives and observed adoption signals. Read the methodology
Which Builder, Operator, and Investor concerns the observed source mix emphasized—not a truth score.
Evidence, demonstrated adoption, hype gap, incentives, and confidence are assessed independently, each on its own current evidence. How these are measured.
Single-outlet relay of one aggregator snapshot
Every figure in the cluster traces to one article on one publisher, itself carrying a 'Via kucoin.com' syndication line, citing DefiLlama without a dated query, methodology note or link. Revenue-versus-fees definitions are used interchangeably. Load-bearing comparative claims (multi-cycle accumulation, Hyperliquid ranking behind) carry no figures at all, and there is no trailing series to test the 'not a spike' characterisation.
Real, sizable fee throughput; no user-level data
The disclosed numbers are actual realised revenue rather than announcements: $1.62m in a day, ~$12m in a week, $40.51m in a month and over $1.2bn cumulative since early 2024. That is durable, monetised usage of one Solana workload sustained across roughly two years. It is scored below the top band because the cluster gives no user counts, token-launch counts, retention or survivorship data, and all of it comes from one aggregator snapshot.
Dollars real, durability asserted rather than shown
The core numbers are concrete and the ranking framing is defensible, so this is not empty hype. Overstatement sits in the interpretation: the piece calls the pace 'roughly in line' while its own figures imply a week running about 27 percent above the trailing month, describes the buyback in corporate stock-buyback terms without PUMP price, float or the fact that purchases shrink proportionally with revenue, and asserts multi-cycle durability and a Hyperliquid comparison with no data. The dek concedes durability is the open question and the body never addresses it.
Trade press item syndicated via an exchange
The body opens 'Via kucoin.com', so the framing reaches readers through a trading venue that benefits from elevated speculative activity, republished by a crypto trade outlet whose audience is token investors. The subject's own token, PUMP, has a supply-reduction narrative that a revenue-leaderboard story directly supports. Nothing in the cluster discloses a paid relationship, so this is read as aligned promotional interest rather than an established conflict.
Directionally credible, weakly sourced
The mechanism and the general scale of Pump.fun's fee capture are plausible and internally coherent, which supports moderate confidence in the direction. Precision and persistence are not established: one publisher, one undated aggregator snapshot, an internal inconsistency between the pace characterisation and the reported figures, and no corroborating source for the comparative claims.
invest
Four years to EUR 400 million: EURC shows demand, not issuance, is the bottleneck1 distinct publisher
invest
The card networks just picked the referee for agent checkout, and it looks like EMVCo2 distinct publishers
invest
Tether says it is not building a chain, which tells you where its money is going instead1 distinct publisher
invest
MiCA never said whether two issuers can mint one stablecoin. Brussels now has to.1 distinct publisher
Distinct publishers with included, body-backed reporting in this cluster.
cryptobriefing.com
1 article · August 15, 2026