Skip to content

Product1 publisher2 min readPublished

Meta charges 12.5 times more for Muse input tokens it promises not to train on

The standard Muse Spark tier promises Meta will not train on your prompts and completions. The contributor tier hands that promise back and charges roughly a twelfth as much for input tokens, with a request cap to match.

The Product Desk · Product desk

Illustration accompanying Meta charges 12.5 times more for Muse input tokens it promises not to train on

What happened

  • The contributor tier charges $0.10 input, $0.20 output and $0.002 cached per million tokens in exchange for permission to use your prompts and completions to train future Meta models.
  • Standard-tier keys get 3,000 requests and 4 million tokens per minute, while contributor keys get 100 requests and 3 million tokens per minute.
  • Muse Voice Transcribe is billed at $0.18 per hour of audio processed, its ZDR option is priced at parity with Standard, and no training-eligible discount tier exists for it at launch.

Compiled by The Product DeskSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • decision Whoever holds the API key is now approving a training-rights grant with every call, and the size of the discount makes that a finance conversation as well as a legal one.
  • constraint The request ceiling on the cheap tier keeps it in prototyping, so a team under cost pressure cannot quietly move production traffic onto it to hit a budget number.
  • exposure Teams whose prompts carry customer or regulated text have nothing to trade here, because the only thing that buys the discount is data they are not free to hand over.
  • precedent A published per-token price for training rights gives buyers a comparison number to hold other vendors' retention terms against, and Meta has already drawn the line at text by leaving audio out.

The decision shows up as a string in a config file. `muse-spark-1.3` and `muse-spark-1.3-contributor` are one word apart, and the word decides whether the text your users typed goes on to train future Meta models [3][4].

The discount is uneven across the three meters. Standard input costs 12.5 times contributor input [1], output 21.25 times [2], and cached input 75 times [3]. For a job that sends a million input tokens and gets 200,000 back, standard bills $2.10 and contributor $0.14, so Meta's promise not to train on that traffic costs $1.96 per run [4].

The rate limits decide who can collect the discount. Meta's documentation says the contributor tier "lowers the barrier to entry for prototyping, testing integrations, and scaling experiments where training on your data is acceptable" [5]. To spend the contributor allowance of 3 million tokens a minute you have to average 30,000 tokens per request; on standard, the equivalent average is 1,333 [5]. The 100-request ceiling also holds you to 144,000 calls a day [6]. That fits batched document work and rules out chat turns and per-row classification. Long prompts bill at the same per-token rate as short ones, so filling the context window is not penalised on its own [11].

Web search grounding and audio time sit outside the tier choice. Grounding costs $2.50 per 1,000 queries on top of the request's token cost, listed under the shared pricing notes [10]. At contributor rates, one grounded search costs $0.0025 against $0.0006 of tokens for a 5,000-token prompt returning 500 [7]. Audio time is billed as a separate line item from token usage, rounded down to whole seconds [9].

For Monday, two facts about the workload settle it. The first is whether the text you send is yours to give away, and customer content covered by a contract that forbids training use is not. The second is whether your call pattern survives 100 requests a minute [6]. Own text in long batched prompts is the one case where contributor pays; own text in many small calls takes standard, because the request cap bites before the savings arrive. Both customer-text cases land on standard, and the data-rights budget line is the gap priced at your own input-output mix. The contributor list covers the 1.3 and 1.2 builds only, so a team pinned to `muse-spark-1.1` stays on standard pricing [4].

What to watch

  • Whether Meta extends the training-eligible discount to Muse Voice Transcribe after launch.
  • Whether the contributor tier's 100 requests per minute rises, since that cap is what confines the discount to prototyping.
  • Whether a contributor build of muse-spark-1.1 appears, or older versions stay on standard pricing only.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories