Skip to content

Science1 publisher3 min readPublished

Two Tasman Sea volcano chains trace back to one plume split by a stalled slab

A simulation that was never tuned to the Tasman Sea, a 200-million-year plate reconstruction and a lead-isotope signature that takes over a billion years to form all point to the Lord Howe and Tasmantid seamount chains sharing one source.

The Scientist · Science desk

Photograph accompanying Two Tasman Sea volcano chains trace back to one plume split by a stalled slab
Photo: yahoo.com

What happened

  • Lord Howe Island is the only part of its seamount chain above water, and a second chain, the Tasmantid seamounts, runs roughly 650 kilometres west of it on almost the same path.
  • Both chains get steadily younger to the south, tracking the northward drift of the Australian plate over the past 40 million years, and the lava from the two is chemically nearly identical.
  • Lead isotopes in both chains share a fingerprint that takes more than a billion years to develop, longer than the 60 million years the nearby subducted slab has been in the mantle.

Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • constraint Hotspot tracks work as a plate-motion reference because the plume beneath them barely moves. A branch steered by a gap beside a sinking slab is anchored to something that does move, so a paired track cannot be treated as two independent fixed points.
  • capability Reconstructions of other side-by-side intraplate chains now have a single-source hypothesis they can test, with a predicted branch spacing of 650 to 900 kilometres to check against.
  • precedent The one-plume model commits its authors to a falsifiable outcome in the Tasman Sea: Tasmantid taking over as the conduit while Lord Howe stops growing, which further dating and volume work can confirm or break.

The spacing is what made the pair a problem. In computer models, two plumes that come within about 1,000 kilometres of each other tend to drift together and merge [6]. Lord Howe and Tasmantid sit roughly 650 kilometres apart [3], 350 kilometres inside that limit [18], and they held that arrangement while the Australian plate carried 40 million years of volcanoes north over them [5].

A single plume rising from close to Earth's core offers a geometric way out. It meets a slab of old ocean floor that sank at a subduction zone and stalled about 500 kilometres down, where the mantle abruptly becomes stiffer. The plume escapes through gaps on either side of the obstacle. Both branches reach the surface, and each builds a chain [9].

Arnould and Coltice's simulation of Earth's interior was not set up to reproduce the Tasman Sea, and the plates and plumes in it evolved on their own [10]. A model tuned until it produced two chains 650 kilometres apart would demonstrate fitting. A generic one that split a plume into branches spaced 650 to 900 kilometres apart, and sustained them for roughly 70 million years, is a different sort of evidence [11]. The observed spacing sits at the bottom of the modelled range [3][11].

The third line of evidence is chemical. Lead isotopes in both chains share a signature that takes more than a billion years to develop, at least 17 times longer than the 60 million years the nearby subducted slab has spent down there [13][19]. The signature came from deep mantle, not from the slab the plume ran into [13]. By itself it cannot exclude two deep sources of similar composition. The authors put that half of the case as a tendency, writing that two unrelated plumes from separate patches of deep mantle "should generally not produce the same rock" [8].

The obstacle itself turns up in a reconstruction of the last 200 million years of plate motion. Mapping where old seafloor sank beneath the Tasman Sea shows a ribbon of slab material with gaps on either side, in the places the model puts each branch [12].

In the simulation, the branching does not last. As the obstructing slab sinks deeper, one branch is uncovered and becomes dominant while the other shuts down [14]. Eruption volumes have been declining along the Lord Howe chain for the past 23 million years or so, while the youngest Tasmantid volcanoes are getting larger [15]. That decline spans roughly 57 percent of the interval the two chains record [20]. The authors expect Tasmantid to become the main conduit and Lord Howe to stop growing [16].

Hotspot chains are used to work out how continents have moved because a plume stays roughly fixed while the plate slides over it [17]. In this account the surface position of a branch depends on where the gap beside the slab is, and the slab is sinking [9][14].

What to watch

  • Dating and volume measurements along the youngest Tasmantid seamounts, against the Lord Howe end, would test whether one branch is really shutting down.
  • Independent seismic imaging of a slab ribbon with gaps at about 500 km depth beneath the Tasman Sea, where the plate reconstruction puts it.
  • Whether other paired intraplate chains sit above a comparable slab geometry, which is what would make the one-plume option general.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories