Loading today’s stories
Leadership1 distinct publisher3 min readUpdated
A Gary, Indiana hot dog shop stayed open through a ten-day blackout on a generator bought the day the storm hit. A competitor who closed lost $19,000 in sales.
The Board Room · Leadership desk
Compiled by The Board RoomSomething wrong?How this is made
The generator was the affordable half of the decision. The other half was a man setting an alarm for the middle of the night to fill gas cans, because the daytime lines at the pumps were too long to sit in [3]. It was also a crew that showed up for every shift with no power waiting for them at home [9], and an owner checking fridge and freezer temperatures while rationing inventory against demand he could not forecast [11]. None of that shows up on the receipt.
Put the two Gary restaurants side by side and the arithmetic is uncomfortable. Hendricks spent $1,300 on hardware the day the storm passed [2]. The other owner, who told Business Insider she closed for most of the week, was down $19,000 in sales [7]. That is roughly fifteen times the price of the machine that would have kept her open [14], and the gap was not opened by capital or by foresight. It was opened by the number of hours between the storm and the purchase.
It is worth being precise about what the win was. Sales rose only slightly during the powerless week, by Hendricks' own account [8], and some of the people he served could not pay, so he fed them anyway [10]. The upside of being the only open kitchen in a dark city is thinner than it sounds. Almost the entire return sits in the loss he did not take.
The reason waiting was not a strategy is in the restoration figures. Koney King got power back after a week [5]. Ten days after the storm, Northern Indiana Public Service Co. still counted more than 38,000 customers without it [6]. Hendricks was at least three days ahead of the households still dark [15], and he had no way of knowing that when he bought the generator. He was carrying 17 cans of gas into the lot the morning he found out the power was back [12]. Anyone who priced the same decision against an assumed two-day outage was pricing a number nobody in Gary had.
The restaurant's 100-year run and its May appearance in FX's "The Bear" are why the story got reported [13]. They are not why the door was open. Fuel was.
"You just adapt to the situations when they arise, and your goal is to get through the day safely," Hendricks told Business Insider [16]. That describes a spending authority more than a temperament. The one part of this a written plan can actually settle is the authorization line: who is allowed to commit four figures, without a phone call, on the afternoon the sky over the dining room turns grey, green and purple and the building starts to shake [17].
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
A derecho, a widespread long-lived wind storm, swept through Gary, Indiana on August 11, downing power lines and trees and causing widespread power outages.
Jimmy Hendricks, owner of Koney King in Gary, bought a $1,300 generator the same day the storm knocked out power.
Hendricks woke in the middle of the night to fill gas cans for the generator because gas station lines were too long during the day.
He kept the restaurant open during its usual business hours despite the lack of power.
Koney King did not get power back until a week after the storm.
As of Friday, 10 days after the storm, over 38,000 customers remained without power, according to Northern Indiana Public Service Co.
Evidence-backed comparisons of source perspectives and observed adoption signals. Read the methodology
Which Builder, Operator, and Investor concerns the observed source mix emphasized—not a truth score.
Evidence, demonstrated adoption, hype gap, incentives, and confidence are assessed independently, each on its own current evidence. How these are measured.
One first-person account plus a single utility figure
Nearly everything rests on one owner's recollection in one article: the generator price, the refueling routine, the sales uptick, staff attendance and free meals are all unverified self-reports. Only two items have external grounding — the derecho itself and the utility-attributed 38,000-customer outage figure. No documents, receipts, second operator interview or utility restoration timeline are supplied, so the specifics are plausible but thinly evidenced.
One site deployed, one peer datapoint
Concrete adoption is observable but tiny: a single generator deployment at a single restaurant for about seven days, one peer that closed, and a utility disclosure establishing that tens of thousands of customers were still without power. Nothing in the cluster shows how many other Gary businesses bought generators or stayed open, and the owner's own framing is 'one of the few,' not a measured share. Scored low because the deployment is real and dated but has no breadth.
Headline superlative outruns the sourcing
The cluster framing asserts this was 'Gary's only working continuity plan,' while the source says only that Koney King was 'one of the few' restaurants able to stay open, and offers no survey of other businesses. The economic hook — a 14.6x ratio of a peer's reported loss to the generator cost — juxtaposes two unaudited owner figures from businesses of unknown comparable size, and the claimed benefit on Koney King's side is an unquantified 'slight increase.' The underlying facts are modest and mostly credible; the packaging is stronger than the evidence, so the gap is positive but not extreme.
Owner reputational upside, publisher human-interest pull
The single interviewee has clear reasons to present the outage favorably: he is the owner of a business with recent television exposure via 'The Bear,' and the flattering elements — sales up, no missed shifts, free meals, community safe haven — are all his own unchallenged statements. The publisher's incentive runs toward a resilient-small-business narrative, evidenced by the absence of any adversarial line on utility performance, generator safety or unverified figures. Not scored higher because no payment, sponsorship or commercial relationship is disclosed or implied in the supplied material.
Facts simple, corroboration absent
Confidence sits below the midpoint. The claims are simple, internally consistent and dated, and the named interviewee and named utility make them checkable in principle, which supports moderate trust. But the cluster has one publisher, one source item and one primary interviewee, the central commercial figures are unaudited, and the derived ratio and restoration comparison inherit that weakness — so nothing here can be independently confirmed within the supplied material.
leadership
Disney swaps raises for discounted stock and a full health-plan re-enrollment1 distinct publisher
leadership
Mamdani's tax office says the data was always public, and sent a memo instead of a witness1 distinct publisher
leadership
Robotaxis Are Taking Mid-Teens Share in Three Metros. Headcount Will Not Show It.1 distinct publisher
leadership
An eight-day outage, $19,000 gone: the small-business risk is now the grid, not the storm1 distinct publisher
Distinct publishers with included, body-backed reporting in this cluster.