Science1 distinct publisher3 min readUpdated
A carbon-14 spike of about 12 parts per thousand in AD 774-775 implies a storm roughly ten times Carrington. Planning against Carrington means planning an order of magnitude short.
The Scientist · Science desk

Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made
Two adjacent rings in a Japanese cedar record a carbon-14 jump of about 12 parts per thousand between AD 774 and AD 775, roughly 20 times the change expected from ordinary variation in the Sun [1]. That matters because the 1859 Carrington event, the benchmark for solar violence ever since it burned telegraph lines across Europe and North America, was not strong enough to leave a clear carbon-14 signature in tree rings at all [7][8][9].
The arithmetic is unkind. To mark the atmosphere the way AD 774 did, the Sun would need to produce a storm ten times larger than Carrington, a superflare [9]. So an organisation that has sized its contingency to Carrington has sized it to roughly a tenth of the largest event the paleorecord actually contains [21]. The instrumental era does not help here: nothing like the AD 774 storm has occurred during the space age, when the Sun has been watched up close by satellites [22].
The provenance of the signal is better than the phrase "tree rings" suggests. Rings are annual records of the atmosphere, and the proportion of carbon-14 in each one tracks how active the Sun was that year [3]. Fusa Miyake found the AD 774-775 spike in 2012 in slices of cedar felled in the 1950s on Yakushima Island [2]. Beryllium-10 in ice cores confirmed it [4], and other teams recovered the same signal from trees in North America and Europe, which rules out a laboratory artifact or a quirk of Japanese cedar [5]. A nearby supernova, a gamma-ray burst and a neutron star blast were all considered and rejected because the candidate sources were too distant [6], leaving the Sun.
Then the counting began. Miyake's team found a second spike the following year in cedar and cypress, confirmed in European oak and Siberian larch [13]. An AD 664 event was identified in 2017 from Greenland ice-core beryllium-10 and matching carbon-14 in Polish oak [14]. A 2022 study led by Nicolas Brehm swept a global tree-ring dataset spanning thousands of years and surfaced two more at once, pushing the phenomenon into prehistory [15]. In 2023 researchers reported the largest confirmed event of the set [16]. Five events have been added since Miyake's first, giving six known so far, at a rate of roughly one every 2,000 years [10][19] - on that recurrence, about a 5 percent chance in any given century [20].
Two consequences follow. First, these events are a problem for solar physics, not just for engineers: current models hold that stars like the Sun are not supposed to produce anything that energetic [11]. Second, and more operationally relevant, the source reports new evidence that lesser storms, still several times more powerful than Carrington, may occur far more often than previously thought [12]. A one-in-2,000-year superflare is a hard sell in a capital plan. A several-times-Carrington event with a shorter return period is not, and it is the one that sets realistic design margins for transformers, satellite electronics and high-frequency communications.
Worth watching: whether the sub-Miyake population firms up into a dated, quantified frequency distribution, because that is the number resilience planning can actually use.
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
New evidence suggests that lesser storms, still several times more powerful than Carrington, may happen far more often than previously thought.
Between AD 774 and 775 the proportion of carbon-14 in ancient Japanese cedar rings jumped by about 12 parts per thousand, roughly 20 times larger than the change expected from ordinary variation in the Sun.
In 2012 Fusa Miyake was studying slices of ancient Japanese cedar taken from a tree felled in the 1950s that had grown on Yakushima Island, and spotted the carbon-14 jump.
Tree rings are annual records of Earth's atmosphere, and the relative proportion of carbon-14 in each ring reveals how active the Sun was that year.
Measurements of beryllium-10, another radioisotope, in ice cores confirmed Miyake's discovery.
Other teams found the same AD 774 signal in trees from North America and Europe, addressing concerns that it was a laboratory artifact or something peculiar to Japanese cedars.
Evidence-backed comparisons of source perspectives and observed adoption signals. Read the methodology
Which Builder, Operator, and Investor concerns the observed source mix emphasized—not a truth score.
Evidence, demonstrated adoption, hype gap, incentives, and confidence are assessed independently, each on its own current evidence. How these are measured.
Multiple independent proxies, reported secondhand
The core anomaly is unusually well corroborated for a historical claim: an annual-resolution carbon-14 proxy, replication in trees on three continents, an independent radioisotope (beryllium-10 in ice cores), and explicit elimination of astrophysical alternatives. Discovery is traceable to named researchers and dated studies (Miyake 2012, the AD 664 identification in 2017, Brehm 2022, the 2023 largest event, a Communications Earth & Environment paper this year). Evidence is capped below high confidence because the cluster contains only one secondary article; no primary paper, dataset or uncertainty interval is supplied, and the intermediate-event frequency is explicitly described as hard to estimate.
No adoption signal in supplied material
Adoption is not a meaningful measured dimension here and the supplied source provides nothing to measure: no releases, deployments, benchmarks, standards revisions, procurement decisions or disclosed changes to space-weather planning thresholds. The article notes only that Carrington remains the benchmark, without evidence that any operator, regulator or standards body has adopted a Miyake-scale design case.
Core numbers solid, imminence framing runs ahead of them
Slightly overstated. The quantitative spine, a 12-parts-per-thousand spike about 20 times ordinary variation, a tree-ring threshold near ten times Carrington, and six events on a roughly millennial-to-bimillennial cadence, is well supported and arguably under-appreciated. The gap comes from framing: the headline warns that trees are 'warning us' and the standfirst says 'we could soon be due one', while the article's own cadence figure implies only a few percent chance per century, and the intermediate-event frequency it leans on is admitted to be poorly constrained. No consequence modelling is offered to back the threat language.
No disclosed funding or commercial stakes
The supplied article discloses no funding sources, institutional interests, commercial products or vendor relationships behind the cited research or the reporting, and no party in the story stands to gain in any way the material describes. Inferring incentives from the general dynamics of science publicity would not be grounded in the supplied source.
Strong underlying science, thin cluster
Confidence in the central factual claims is high because they rest on independent proxies and a decade of attributed studies. Confidence in the assessment overall is held to the middle because the cluster has one publisher and one secondary article, no primary literature or datasets are available for checking, quantitative uncertainty is absent, the forward-looking and intermediate-event portions are explicitly under-constrained, and adoption and incentive dimensions cannot be measured at all.
science
The people paid to love Antarctica are quitting, and 450,000 visitors are the reason1 distinct publisher
Distinct publishers with included, body-backed reporting in this cluster.
1 article · August 17, 2026