Invest1 distinct publisher3 min readPublished
CXMT turned 150.3 billion yuan of half-year sales into 77.6 billion yuan of profit. Goldman still marks the shares at about ten times next year's earnings, which is the market declining to price the shortage as permanent.
The Investor · Invest desk

Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made
Run the ratio and 77.6 billion against 150.3 billion yuan is 51.6 percent falling through to net profit [6], which is what happens when price moves against a cost base that mostly does not, and a year earlier the same product line produced a loss [2] in what the report calls a market for commodity products [7]. Annualise the half and the run rate is 300.6 billion yuan against a prior full year that must have been under 75.2 billion, since six months more than doubled it [20].
The forward numbers are where price and value part company. Goldman Sachs has the shares at roughly ten times next year's estimated earnings [14] on forecasts of 361 billion yuan of net income next year against an estimated 161 billion this year [15], which multiplies out to about 3.61 trillion yuan of implied market value [16], call it 538 billion dollars at the 6.71 the report's own dollar conversion implies [17]. This year's estimate is nearly closed already: 77.6 billion booked leaves 83.4 billion for the second half, 7.5 percent above the first [18]. So the argument is entirely about the 2.24x step to 361 billion [19].
This is probably wrong, but the ten times reads less like a governance discount than a refusal to capitalise a peak, and the counter-thesis has real teeth. Samsung, SK Hynix and Micron are all prioritising the high-end memory that AI accelerators require [8], which is capacity they are not pointing at conventional DRAM, and CXMT, the world's fourth-biggest DRAM maker [5], is working on its own high-bandwidth memory but does not have it yet [10]. The leverage it is exercising sits in the commodity tier, which is the tier that reprices fastest in both directions [7].
More interesting than passing Tencent as China's most valuable company [4] is where the money goes. The 66.6 billion yuan Shanghai raise [3] is smaller than one half-year's profit [2], so the stated plan to fund capacity expansion and catch up with larger rivals [9] is a cash-flow decision rather than a financing one, and those wafers land in 2027 (the report is dated 29 August 2026, so its "next year" is 2027) [21]. Most Western buyers will not own a CXMT die: the Apple discussions Bloomberg reported cover devices sold in China [11], and a group of US senators has already told Apple to drop Chinese suppliers [12]. They will still pay a version of the Hefei price, because the pass-through is already sitting in Nvidia's system quotes [13].
What would break the thesis: second-half profit under 83.4 billion yuan [18], which would say the pricing peaked in the first half, or incumbent capex that puts conventional DRAM wafers into 2027 faster than CXMT's expansion can [8].
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
CXMT's first-half revenue expanded to 150.3 billion yuan (US$22.4 billion), almost 10-fold higher, and more than double the sales it made across all of last year.
CXMT posted a first-half profit of 77.6 billion yuan, compared with a loss a year earlier.
A month before the earnings, CXMT completed China's second-biggest IPO, in Shanghai, raising 66.6 billion yuan with an overallotment option.
CXMT's stock has kept rising since its debut and the company has overtaken Tencent Holdings to become China's largest by market capitalisation.
The Hefei-based company is the world's fourth-biggest maker of DRAM.
CXMT had until recently incurred hefty losses competing in a market for commodity products.
Distinct publishers with included, body-backed reporting in this cluster.
1 article · September 1, 2026
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
invest
Samsung's chip chief tells his own executives that 17% to parity is not a moat1 distinct publisher
invest
CXMT's ceiling is 240,000 wafers a month, and that is the DRAM price forecast1 distinct publisher
product
Xiaomi qualifies CXMT's LPDDR6 for its September foldable1 distinct publisher
invest
Nvidia stops eating memory costs: AI server prices up more than 15% on early-2027 shipments1 distinct publisher
Evidence-backed comparisons of source perspectives and observed adoption signals. Read the methodology
Which Builder, Operator, and Investor concerns the observed source mix emphasized—not a truth score.
Evidence, demonstrated adoption, hype gap, incentives, and confidence are assessed independently, each on its own current evidence. How these are measured.
One desk, and much of it Bloomberg's
Every number that matters — 150.3 billion, 77.6 billion, the Tencent overtake, Goldman's ten times — arrives through a single Taipei Times write-up drawing on Bloomberg copy. No filing, no exchange notice, no second newsroom. The arithmetic layered on top holds cleanly, which is worth something, but it inherits whatever the underlying figures are worth. And the two most consequential forward claims, Apple's supplier talks and the Nvidia server increase, are carried entirely by people who would not be named.
The revenue is real; the high end is still a promise
You cannot fake 150.3 billion yuan of half-year sales at a 51.6 percent margin, and capital has followed it — a 66.6 billion yuan raise and the largest market capitalisation in China. But the part of the market that actually matters for AI accelerators is where CXMT isn't yet: Samsung, SK Hynix and Micron are steering capacity into high-end memory while CXMT's own high-bandwidth memory remains under development. Apple is in conversations, not on a purchase order. What is fully adopted here is the price, visible in Nvidia's server increases.
The forward half outruns the recorded half
Our own framing — that the market declines to price the shortage as permanent — is an inference drawn from one broker's multiple, and it deserves to be labelled as such. Look inside Goldman's numbers and the tension surfaces: the current-year estimate implies a second half only 7.5 percent above the first, then 2027 profit leaps 2.24 times. The cheapness is entirely the leap. Everything already banked is documented; the part doing the persuading is not.
Everyone quoted gains from the telling
The valuation case comes from a sell-side house publishing on a company that listed a month earlier. The strategic case — proceeds into capacity, home-grown high-bandwidth memory — is the company's own line, and it is precisely the line that a self-sufficiency push rewards. Nvidia's customers describing a 15 percent increase have reason to make that increase public, and the senators pressing Apple are campaigning. None of this is disqualifying; it does mean nearly every voice in the story profits from how it lands.
Sure of the ledger, unsure of the witness
Internally this holds together: the margin, the run rate, the implied market value and the second-half gap all follow from figures printed in the same piece, and they follow correctly. The doubt is upstream. A story of this size — the largest company in China by market value, reporting a reversal from loss to a 51.6 percent net margin — should be visible from more than one masthead, and until it is, our reading is only as good as one relayed account.