Skip to content

Science1 publisher2 min readPublished

EDHEC's climate risk model rates 43% of Europe's World Heritage sites highly exposed

The number comes from running the EDHEC Climate Institute's hazard methods over UNESCO's spatial database. What it measures is exposure at a location, which is a separate question from damage to old stone.

The Scientist · Science desk

Illustration accompanying EDHEC's climate risk model rates 43% of Europe's World Heritage sites highly exposed

What happened

  • Their macroeconomic projections put end-of-century losses to local gross regional product at up to 41% in Rome and 32% in Madrid.
  • A survey of American art museums cited in the analysis found 35% of directors reporting climate-related damage already, and 50% reporting specific plans to address the risk.
  • The Louvre has begun transferring around 250,000 works to its Lievin Conservation Center in Pas-de-Calais to protect the national collections from flooding.
  • Venice projections in the analysis suggest more frequent acqua alta could make normal operations at La Fenice impossible by 2100.

Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • constraint A location score ranks sites by the hazard at their coordinates. Costing an actual repair takes building-level vulnerability, so the exposure share cannot serve as a budget input for any single cathedral or collection.
  • cost With the steepest regional losses projected in Mediterranean cities, the money for protection would have to come increasingly from national budgets and insurers, because local revenue is projected to fall furthest exactly where the sites cluster.
  • decision Moving the contents is the option this kind of evidence supports, and the Louvre's transfer shows the scale that implies for any institution holding a collection in a floodplain.
  • contradiction The exposure estimate is European while the only preparedness data in the analysis comes from American directors, so the work does not measure how many European institutions have a plan.

The estimate is a location score. UNESCO's spatial database supplies the positions of the physical assets. The EDHEC Climate Institute's climate risk quantification methods attach hazard estimates to them for extreme weather, flooding and sea level rise, according to the authors' account published by phys.org [2]. The article states that share and the economic projections. It does not say where the high-exposure cutoff sits, how many European sites were scored, or which emissions scenario the economics assume [20].

The threats the authors list are material: increased humidity and mold on paintings and frescoes, deterioration of materials under temperature fluctuations, more acid rain, and more fires, floods and landslides [4]. Whether a particular church loses a fresco depends on its walls, its heating and whether anyone reads the hygrometer, none of which sits in a spatial database. The authors count failures of conservation systems among the exposures facing collections, alongside flooding, humidity swings and heat waves [21]. They argue the problem reaches past Venice and the Mediterranean historic centers into artifacts scattered through churches, libraries, local collections and small museums [3].

The economic half is where the numbers get large. Against Rome's projected regional figure, Italy's national GDP decline by 2100 is put at 19% [14], with Vienna at 13% and Berlin at 18% [15]. Subtract the national number from the Roman one and the city sits 22 percentage points below its own country's trajectory [16]. That gap is the concentration the authors describe when they say regional impacts are most pronounced in Mediterranean cities [19]. On the funding side they write that "It is precisely at the moment when the investment required to protect our heritage will be greatest that financial resources may be most limited" [18].

Spruce from the Val di Fiemme in the Dolomites, the tonewood used historically for Stradivarius violins, is under pressure from rising temperatures and the spread of pests [9]. Water stress and deforestation are making the woods used for bows and stringed instruments scarcer [10]. Those are supply chains, and they sit outside the database the exposure share was computed from. Beyond La Fenice, the authors place five coastal venues in the same category, among them the Elbphilharmonie in Hamburg and the Sydney Opera House [12].

What to watch

  • Publication of the site-level scores and the high-exposure threshold. That would let individual custodians check their own holdings against the 43%.
  • A European counterpart to the American directors' survey, showing whether preparedness tracks exposure on the continent where the 43% was measured.
  • Whether insurers and lenders begin pricing heritage cover off location-based hazard scores of this type.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories