Skip to content

Product1 publisher3 min readPublished

Amazon turns its Conditions of Use into an off switch for shopping agents

Meta's Muse started hitting a Conditions of Use popup on Amazon.com on Sunday evening, and the next day Amazon filed a 41-page amended complaint against Perplexity. Anyone shipping a buying agent now needs the store's permission first.

The Product Desk · Product desk

Illustration accompanying Amazon turns its Conditions of Use into an off switch for shopping agents

What happened

  • Amazon told Bloomberg it began blocking Meta's Muse assistant from Amazon.com on Sunday evening, after Meta declined a request to take Amazon out of the agent's experience.
  • The same day, according to retail newsletter writer Jason Del Rey, Amazon filed a 41-page amended complaint against Perplexity pleading computer fraud, California's computer data access statute and tortious interference with contract.
  • The complaint alleges Comet for iOS copies a shopper's Amazon session cookie to Perplexity's cloud servers, which run a virtual browser and request Amazon pages with no user device involved.
  • Amazon says eight of its traffic engineers have spent at least 1,280 hours on the agent problem since July 2025, and that Comet ran at least 185,712 sessions on Amazon.com through 15 June 2026.

Compiled by The Product DeskSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • constraint The largest US store can be removed from an agent's scope by a popup served to the customer, so an agent team's shopping coverage depends on a retailer decision they cannot reverse with work on their own side.
  • exposure Amazon logged the traffic daily across a 54-day window, so what an agent vendor's lawyers tell a court about where requests originate is checkable against the destination's own records.
  • precedent Meta sells through Facebook and Instagram and pays Amazon to run agentic workloads, and was blocked anyway, so other builders cannot treat a commercial relationship as an access agreement.
  • decision Identifying the agent in its requests invites refusal and hiding it invites a computer fraud claim, and teams have to pick one before they ship.

The shopper who lost a cart on Sunday evening had agreed to Amazon's Conditions of Use as a customer. The popup told them that "Continued access by an unauthorized AI agent violates Amazon's Conditions of Use, to which our customers have agreed" [2]. Todd Bishop reported it for GeekWire on Sunday night [3]. Muse books, buys and fills in forms, and it has been out since 8 September [15].

Amazon's public case is about permission. "We think it's fairly straightforward that third-party applications that offer to make purchases on behalf of customers from other businesses should operate openly and respect service provider decisions about whether or not to participate," Amazon spokesperson Lara Hendrickson said in an emailed statement to Bloomberg [6]. She compared it to food delivery apps and the restaurants they take orders for, and to online travel agencies and airlines [7].

The complaints Amazon gave reporters are narrower and mostly technical. Meta never said Muse would access the store, Amazon told GeekWire, and the agent does not identify itself while browsing [8]. Amazon also says Muse appears to capture and store customer credentials [8]. Georgia Hennessy reported for Business Insider that Amazon accuses the agent of scraping account data and of bypassing the personalisation in Amazon's shopping pages, so people are shown products that ignore their own purchase history [9]. Meta answered the credentials point in its launch announcement, saying Muse "has no visibility into people's passwords or payment methods" [10]. Meta did not respond to requests for comment from Bloomberg, Business Insider or GeekWire [11].

Perplexity is the litigated version of the same objection. It launched Comet for iOS on 18 March 2026, nine days after the district court enjoined it [18]. In briefs filed on 1 April and 6 May 2026, Perplexity told the appeals court that "no Perplexity computer ever has direct access to an Amazon computer" [20]. Amazon says its engineers watched exactly that traffic every day between 18 March and at least 11 May, 54 days [21][3]. Amazon's counsel wrote on 6 May identifying each statement by page and asking for a correction, and Perplexity repeated the statements in a reply brief filed later that day [22]. Five days after that, Perplexity's counsel wrote that "As a measure of good-faith, Perplexity has temporarily disabled the assistant feature on Amazon.com in Comet for iOS" [23].

Divide the damages Amazon claims, well beyond $260,000, by the session count in the complaint, and the store is pricing agent traffic at roughly $1.40 a session [24][1]. Split the engineering time eight ways and each of those people has put about 160 hours into it since July 2025 [2].

Muse was the number one free app in Apple's US App Store within a week, ahead of ChatGPT [16]. The ranking is by downloads, and the reporting does not cover repeat use.

Whether an agent can transact on a store someone else owns comes down to two tests about the store, not the model. First, the destination has to have agreed in writing to be in the agent's scope. Second, the store has to be able to see who is asking. Amazon says Muse fails the second because the agent does not identify itself while browsing [8], and it failed the first when Meta declined the request to take Amazon out of the experience [5]. The remedy was a popup the customer had to read.

Commercial ties leave the first test open. Amazon products have been purchasable inside Facebook and Instagram since 2023 [12], and Meta signed a multibillion-dollar deal in April to run agentic AI workloads on Amazon's cloud [13]. Amazon told GeekWire it was in direct conversation with Meta and declined to say whether it would sue [14].

What to watch

  • Whether Amazon sues Meta; it told GeekWire it was in direct conversation and declined to say.
  • Whether the appeals court acts on Amazon's allegation about the 1 April and 6 May briefs.
  • Whether Meta ships an agent that identifies itself to stores, which would test how much of Amazon's objection was technical.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories