Science1 distinct publisher3 min readUpdated
A Sussex team measured what honeybees spend and what they gain per trip across two British cities. Efficiency peaks in spring and bottoms out in August.
The Scientist · Science desk

Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made
Researchers at the University of Sussex have published a study in Functional Ecology that they describe as the first to directly measure the seasonal swing in the energy honeybees spend and gain while foraging [1][2]. Their answer is that the hard part of the year is late July and August, not spring [3][4], which puts most well-intentioned pollinator planting in the season when bees are already doing fine.
The method is the point. Instead of counting blooms and inferring supply, the team scored energy out from the time a bee spent flying and walking in a 60-second observation window, and energy in from the number and species of flowers visited and the nectar those flowers held [5]. That produced foraging data from 1,217 honeybees and nectar data from 1,426 flowers [6], collected from April to October at green spaces in and around Brighton and Edinburgh, including Arthur's Seat, the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh and Falmer village [7] - a seven-month window covering the active season [17].
Foraging efficiency was highest in spring, when insect-pollinated trees such as horse chestnut, willow and cherry are in bloom [9]. Shortage was most acute in late July and August [4]. The researchers attribute the dip to two things at once: fewer flowers in bloom and more active pollinators competing for them [10]. Brighton and Edinburgh, roughly 600 km apart, showed similar patterns, which the authors read as evidence that the late-summer squeeze applies across much of Britain [8].
Co-author Nicholas Balfour said the timing matters because late summer is when the vast majority of pollinator species are active and provisioning offspring [11]. Co-author Ciaran Harris argued the practical consequence follows directly: flowers that bloom when nectar is hardest to get are worth more than flowers that bloom when it is easy, and that can be achieved by planting late-summer bloomers, changing mowing schedules, or tolerating summer weeds such as thistle, ragwort and knapweed [12]. Read against the spring efficiency peak [9], the cheap version of that advice is the interesting one: the highest-value intervention is not buying plants, it is declining to cut things down in August.
Two caveats sit in the paper itself. Honeybees are a managed species being used as a landscape proxy; Harris justifies this on the grounds that they visit a wide variety of flower species and so indicate general nectar availability [14]. And the study covered green spaces in only two locations, which left the team unable to test how land use shapes nectar supply through the year [16]. Professor Francis Ratnieks said the direct energetic measurements confirm a pattern already emerging from indirect work in the same lab, including decoding bee dances to infer how far bees had to fly month by month [15].
The authors also note that heat waves reduce nectar in flowers and disrupt flowering times, on top of existing pressures such as agricultural intensification [13]. Watch for the land-use follow-up Harris flags, which is meant to test whether gardens and agri-environment farmland actually plug the seasonal gaps [16]. Until then, the operational takeaway is a date range, not a plant list.
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
The study is the first to use a novel method of directly measuring seasonal changes in the energy honeybees expend and gain from foraging.
Similar patterns were found in Brighton and Edinburgh despite the cities being about 600 km (370 miles) apart, suggesting late summer might be a challenging period for bees to gather food in many areas of Britain.
New research on honeybee foraging was published in the journal Functional Ecology by researchers from the University of Sussex.
The researchers found that honeybees find it hardest to forage for nectar in late summer, particularly in August.
Conducting their study in green spaces in and around Brighton and Edinburgh, the researchers found that food shortages were most acute in late July and August, suggesting bees found it most challenging to gather nectar in those months.
Energy expended during foraging was calculated from the amount of time spent flying and walking in a 60-second period; energy received was calculated from the number and species of flowers visited and the quantities of nectar.
Evidence-backed comparisons of source perspectives and observed adoption signals. Read the methodology
Which Builder, Operator, and Investor concerns the observed source mix emphasized—not a truth score.
Evidence, demonstrated adoption, hype gap, incentives, and confidence are assessed independently, each on its own current evidence. How these are measured.
Peer-reviewed primary study with disclosed samples, but single-source and two sites
The cluster rests on one press-release-style article, yet that article names a peer-reviewed journal, a DOI, an explicit measurement protocol, a seven-month window, two geographically separated cities, and sample sizes of 1,217 bees and 1,426 flowers. It also self-reports its main limitation (two locations, land use untested). Evidence is solid for the core seasonal ranking and weak for the mechanistic, cross-taxon and climate extensions.
No adoption or uptake evidence in cluster
The supplied source reports a research finding and management recommendations but no releases, deployments, policy changes, planting programmes or usage disclosures. Nothing in the cluster shows any party acting on the findings, so adoption cannot be measured.
Core finding modestly framed; extensions outrun the data
The measured claim — spring peak, late-July/August trough across two cities — is presented in proportion to the data. The overshoot is in the framing around it: nationwide relevance inferred from two cities, applicability to all flower-visiting insects argued via an indicator-species assumption, and a heat-wave amplification narrative with no supporting measurement. The article partly self-corrects by publishing the two-site limitation and the call for land-use follow-ups, which keeps the gap small rather than large.
Institution-sourced announcement, co-author voices only
Every attributed voice in the cluster is a co-author of the study, and the piece follows research-announcement structure through to a publication-details block — a pattern consistent with institutional promotion of newly published work, including the priority claim of being 'first' to measure this directly. There is no evidence in the cluster of commercial sponsorship, funder pressure or product interest, so the incentive reading is limited to publication and visibility incentives rather than financial ones.
Single publisher, single study, unmeasured adoption
Confidence is capped by cluster structure: one publisher, one underlying paper, no independent commentary and no adoption signal. The method and sample disclosures plus the journal DOI raise confidence in the narrow seasonal finding, while the mechanistic, cross-taxon and climate claims remain unverified within the cluster.
science
Dieback's bill comes due in soil, not just in dead grasstrees1 distinct publisher
Distinct publishers with included, body-backed reporting in this cluster.
1 article · August 19, 2026